“You can’t start
a successful project without a charter.”
Ask five project
managers whether they agree with that statement.
Then ask them
what a project charter contains and entails.
Hey, ask those
project managers if they’ve ever seen such a document.
Even if they all
work for the same organization, you’re very likely to get as many as five
separate answers to most of the three questions – if not all of them.
A project
charter:
Is it a detailed
specification of desired actions/outcomes/constraints determined at high
management levels and issued to the project manager?
Is it the
foundational description of the key project elements developed by the actual
leaders of the project?
Is it an expression
of mutual agreement among all key stakeholding decision-makers, after
negotiation of their interests and commitments?
If there isn’t
something called a “charter,” what do the project managers base their project
planning and execution on? What do they call it? What does it do?
Whatever the various answers, you can
expect each of them to be expressed with absolute assurance. This is the way it
is. Period.
Each respondent
is certain he/she alone has it right. As these disconnected concepts are
carried into project execution, they account for a large share of what goes
wrong with projects.
We define our
Project Management activities by the terms we have picked up along the way, and
we conduct our projects the way we were taught. Mostly, what we do conforms
quite closely with the way we were introduced to it. We resist or reject doing
things in other ways.
Habits of the
mind. Project definitions make an excellent example. If our launch document is
called a “Project Charter,” and it includes key internal activities, plus a
budget and a schedule, we adopt it and swear by it.
It doesn’t work,
but project charters never have. We’re used to that, and we have habituated a
management mode that pretends to honor the charter while we generally do things
the way we always have.
That’s not really
project management, but what are you supposed to do? The charter is our
directive from management, and who’s going to fight with them? When the holes
open up, we improvise and do the best we can.
We always wind up
over budget, late on schedule and short on results – but that’s the way it is.
Everybody expects it.
Projects never
come in on plan. Never have and never will.
We love our habits. That’s a problem as
we seek to become good project managers.
Why? Because
project management is counter-intuitive, if you consider intuition to be our “logical”
way of thinking, initiating and responding amid the swirling demands and
possibilities of our daily lives.
Projects are not
business as usual, and we are imprisoned by the habits we have invested in for
our lifetimes. If we make a habit of expecting project shortfalls, you know what? That's what we'll produce.
We can’t function
without our automated behaviors, aka habits. Which shoe did you put on first
this morning? What did you do, minute by minute, in the first hour of the day?
For that matter, how did you make the myriad decisions that got you, safely,
into the car, across town, into the workplace, through the day?
Can you even
remember doing those things? How much
conscious thought did each of those moments demand of you, vs. the first time
you did them . . . some of them many decades ago?
For that matter,
how do you know where you live? How come you seem to get there, unerringly,
every day from wherever you have been?
Habit, that’s
how. Once you learned something, or figured it out, you could file it away under
“Automated Behavior” in your mental toolbox and forget about it.
Habits make it
possible for us to function. If you had to focus specifically on each specific
step in tying your shoes, or driving your car, or shopping for groceries –
you’d never get through your day.
That’s why Project Management is so hard.
It requires you
to surface many, many personal behaviors you haven’t had to think about in
years . . . and consciously reset them. Consciously, mindfully focus on them
time after time, until this constant specific attention becomes as automated
as walking through your home has always been.
Project
Management has a lot in common with everyday functional management, but –
significantly – not everything. This can be a serious problem.
You, the project
manager, can slip productively into functional management behavior for parts of
your work.
Then you discover
that you’re suddenly at a precipice where the unique character of this
situation makes the next “regular” step disastrously inappropriate. Yes, the
module is the right structure, but the instrumentation can’t fit or
function without nonexistent modifications we never knew we’d need.
Good thing you
noticed it before you unconsciously took that routine action. Hmm. Ought to
make a habit of noticing such things – in time if not ahead of time.
That alertness
for the unexpected, or anticipation of it, is, as a matter of fact, a basic
skill of the competent project manager. The best of us shift
smoothly into that gear in the midst of the multiple simultaneous dynamics of a
real project.
These heroes of
ours are keeping in touch with the doers of action items, foreseeing and
blocking the emergence of problems, exchanging current information with all the
key project stakeholders, managing team relationships, ensuring effective
correction of variances . . .
They have internalized as regular
behavior the ability to keep tabs on all that, while making decisions – good decisions
– promptly, and detecting and meeting the needs of team members, sponsors and
deliverable users. This is the ultimate Project Manager Habit.
And, not at all incidentally, its practitioners have
perfected the vital tools of communication. One important activity you will see
the top project managers invariably engage in is fully clarifying assumptions,
definitions and intentions. Right up front.
What is meant, included
and intended in the terms we use? Do we all agree on the words, the meanings
and the implications? Do we address differences as they surface, and make sure
everybody knows, understands and agrees?
Openly and comprehensively
accounting for communication realities is among the most valuable of project
manager habits.
Call that thing a
“Project Charter,” a “Project Overview” or a “Crate of Oranges.” Doesn’t
matter. Just so we all know exactly what it is.
SEE ALSO: Project Communication: When It Ain't Broke, It Can Fix Whatever Is
http://jimmillikenproject.blogspot.com/2010/08/project-communication-when-it-aint.html
SEE ALSO: Project Communication: When It Ain't Broke, It Can Fix Whatever Is
http://jimmillikenproject.blogspot.com/2010/08/project-communication-when-it-aint.html
No comments:
Post a Comment