Good managers ask a lot of questions.
Besides the need to know what’s going on and why, they must be able to
negotiate well – something that calls for a really well developed sense of
questioning.
Whenever I can, I squeeze a negotiating
piece into management training, especially project management training. They’re
negotiating all the time.
Good negotiators do a lot of careful
preparation, but they are fully aware that they can never know enough to
completely understand the values – and therefore the motivations – of their
counterpart(s) on the other side of the table.
So their presentation of incentives in
bargaining is preceded by, and continually enriched by, a search for additional
information. The Holy Grail is finding the route to a mutually beneficial
outcome.
Real negotiators are never looking to beat
anybody. They want happy campers all around when it’s over. They recognize that
there will be a future.
They
employ open questions, lots of them. And especially the kind of really open
question that is in the form of a comment designed to set off ample response by
the other party: “You’ve got quite a reputation for really knowing the
publishing industry. Whenever people talk about publishing, your name comes
up.” Pause.
More often than not, that will elicit some
conversation from the counterpart. It’s hard to resist talking when you’re
offered encouragement like that.
Anything more explicit may not be
necessary. But if it is, a slight push usually will do the trick. Say, with a modified
open question: “People nowadays think they can do it themselves and save a lot
of money. What do you think?”
Once you trigger the person’s interest,
you keep it going by judicious insertion of thoughtful additional questions and
comments. Your intention is to open a channel in which useful information will
flow.
It’s sales. You get the prospect talking.
If you’re alert, and ask the right questions in the right places, you’ll turn
up some useful clues to information and motivation.
An important
area that is sorely in need of questions – and generally gets far too few
of them – is that of assumptions. This issue is a vital matter in project
management and in any negotiation, but you find it in every venue of life. We
deal with it dozens of times a day – mostly in tiny ways, and unexpectedly in
very important moments.
Anything that is stated as a given, an
incontrovertible truth, should be a prime target for questioning. And definitely
so if it is presented strongly, with absolute assurance. When you’re not
careful, emotional intensity can seem to be an adequate substitute for facts
and proof. It’s not.
In any situation, the key that could
unlock seemingly intractable disagreement often is embedded in one or more of those purported
absolutes: “Management will never accept anything that doesn’t include these
five factors and isn’t finished by (date).”
It is not unusual for the parties in a
negotiation to stipulate such matters as unchangeable, then exhaust themselves
attempting to save the ship by rearranging the available deck chairs.
What if, having discovered they are at a no-win point,
they open the door wide to questions? Questions about everything – including what
had seemed utterly, fundamental so.
The wide-open door to questions might
produce this possibility: Let’s find out just why we were told there had to be
those five factors and the absolute deadline.
What information were they working from?
Why these five factors, and why this deadline? What do the executives really
want, and what are they prepared to give in return for it?
There may be realities now revealed that
counter the original assumptions of the senior management directives.
The focus of negotiation is radically
changed. Now the original negotiators join forces to convince their bosses to critically
examine those defining assumptions – quite possibly for the first time. And
then adopt a mutually advantageous solution resulting from their new
understanding.
The habit of examining everything, taking
nothing as given, is a hallmark of good management.
No question.
We value the good listener. What are your views on how asking questions fits into the good listener description? Please comment.
SEE ALSO:
Magic Isn't. Politics Is.
http://jimmillikenproject.blogspot.com/2012/08/magic-isnt-politics-is.html
We value the good listener. What are your views on how asking questions fits into the good listener description? Please comment.
SEE ALSO:
Magic Isn't. Politics Is.
http://jimmillikenproject.blogspot.com/2012/08/magic-isnt-politics-is.html
No comments:
Post a Comment