Meetings often
are the tragedies of organizations. Many meetings suffocate initiative, disrupt
productivity and poison attitudes.
This is
tragic because good meetings are the jewels of organizations. Done right,
meetings multiply the value of the knowledge, talent and skill collected in
that place at that time. They produce remarkable payoffs for the organization,
and heighten the participants’ productivity and enthusiasm. The immediate
benefit contributes to continuous improvement.
If only the
group would occasionally have a meeting about meetings, its native good sense
could very well dissolve this epidemic of bad meetings, because the antidotes
are relatively simple and sensible.
My
credentials for this consideration are a personal history covering countless
hundreds of meetings over five decades or so – first as a reporter covering meetings, then as an organization man who
attended and ran meetings, now as a student of meetings helping leaders and
managers derive the great benefits of good management.
Why are so many meetings so bad? Mainly
because most of us don’t even think about the matter, and those who do sometimes
are part of the problem.
We humans
are a herd species, genetically programmed to assemble. So that’s what we do.
We gather together, especially at times of opportunity or stress. So far so
good. In organizational terms, that would mean meeting to make things better by
creating a new thing or a solution to a bad thing.
Here’s where it gets out of focus. Meetings tend to take on a life of their own, and
occur not to accomplish anything but because they are permanently engraved in
the schedule. Everybody, sometimes even including the leader, complains, but
the almighty meeting continues to grind away the soul of the organization.
At the
worst, the meeting becomes a weapon in the group’s internal strife: Sullen
staffers show up, because they’ll be punished if they don’t. The boss proves
his/her continuing authority through the demonstrated power to drag these busy
people from their work.
Most of the time, though, the meeting
comes to occupy Tuesday morning simply because it’s Tuesday morning and we
always meet on Tuesday morning. If back in time there was an expectation of
value for this meeting, it long since has been forgotten.
Many
unscheduled meetings – called for a specific purpose – waste just as much time
because someone hopes they will solve a problem. As everyone sits there wasting
time, it turns out the perpetrator didn’t do anything to explore the matter or
discuss it with the one or two people who could deal with it.
It’s not
unusual that the proper course would have been for the person just to make a
decision and do something.
What’s the
solution to the bad-meetings problem? First of all, to actually think about it,
and then talk about it.
Well-managed
organizations understand that communication is their lifeblood, and they know
its various vehicles should be properly set up and usefully employed. They make
sure they have effective channels among their various parts. They devise and
follow sensible procedures for the use of email. And they plan and conduct
meetings properly.
The role of meetings is quite specific
in a sensible communication management system. There are organizational needs
that can be met only by bringing together the right people with sufficient
preparation for a clear purpose, and managing a productive exchange among them.
That means
the right people – and only the right people – get proper notice, receive an
advance agenda and do the necessary homework. They arrive on time, commit to a
defined outcome, speak and listen courteously and openly in a disciplined
process that lasts just long enough.
The meeting
produces decisions and/or action assignments that are clear and relevant.
Meeting notes or minutes are promptly produced and distributed to the pertinent
parties.
Groups, like
individuals, think about what they talk about, and they act on their thoughts. A
little talk about meetings can be all it takes to ignite a very useful
transformation.
No comments:
Post a Comment