Wait a minute, wait a minute. Problems are bad, not good.
Problems mean things aren’t working, and there’s cost and damage. If you see
everything as a problem, you’re a pessimist, not an optimist. Right?
Wrong. Not so for the practicing optimist. When things aren’t the way they should be, this brand of
optimist sees opportunity. I can fix that. If it ain’t broke, I can’t fix it
and there’s no challenge. If there is something wrong with it, my profession is
to find and implement a solution. If I don’t know how to fix it, I know how to
find a way to fix it.
Substitute “project manager” for “optimist" and you get the
idea. Project management is a system devised and upgraded over the last 60
years or so to move groups and organizations from Point A to Point B. The more
demanding, risky and complicated the move, the more you need the project
manager.
The birth of
practical optimism comes in how it defines what is before it. For example: How do you define the word "problem?" What is a
problem? Here's a definition: A problem is anything that is not the way I
want it to be.
Set aside for the moment the self-centeredness of that
formulation. Look at the logic that can be built on it. If the problem is
something I don’t want, then the solution would be something I do want. Simple,
huh? Maybe too simple.
The concept gains meaning as you convert it to process terms. It
requires that I thoroughly study what the current situation is. That I uncover what
exactly it is about it that I don’t like – and why. Then I must describe and
specify just what it is that I want instead.
Interestingly, we rarely know enough about either the
current state or the desired one.
One reason problem solving is so frequently frustrated is
that we set out with superficial and incomplete information about what we want
to fix or improve. Then we fail to clearly and specifically define exactly what
it is we are trying to accomplish.
Both original problem and ultimate goal are inadequately
known and understood.
So the optimist/project
manager, confident that a solution can be and will be achieved, devotes a
thoroughgoing and inclusive examination to the current situation, carefully avoiding the temptation to slip into jumping for solutions. This part is disciplined; a deep dive into the now.
Plenty of
direct questions are formulated, and plenty of effort is invested in making
sure real answers are pursued until they are really answered. All stakeholding
parties are fully represented by informed and committed decision makers.
Then, only then, can a credible process of movement from A
to B be devised and executed. This, too, demands a well-managed process. All
the stakeholders, particularly those in authority who control resources and
authorize project actions, must remain adequately connected.
This entire business is infested with problems, many of
which could derail the process and/or poison the collaborative spirit that must
drive the entire project. You need an honest, logical process to organize and
control a coordinated group effort, foresee and manage risk and, most of all, successfully
engage the unforeseen.
One last point, referring back to the admittedly selfish
definition of a problem as “Something that is not the way I want it to be.” Any
project manager is fully knowledgeable that all the stakeholders are going to
act in self-interest. The project manager knows that his/her job requires making sure
that those multiple self-interests are aligned to the purposes of the project.
A perfect political challenge for an optimistic problem solver.
Throughout, problem solving is the name of the game. A game
that is played well only by optimists who see problems everywhere. And solutions. Good thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment